Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Frozen River

Overall Score: 75


Director: Courtney Hunt
Run Time: 97 min
Rating: R


Viewer Bias: 8

As a former student of film, I have a soft spot for productions that are nominated for Academy Awards. The only reason this particular film caught my interest was based on lead actress Melissa Leo's Oscar nomination for "best actress" and director/screenwriter Courtney Hunt's nomination for "best screenplay written directly for the screen." Therefore, I already place this film on a higher pedestal. Additionally, this film is shot similarly to "The Wrestler" which can bore some audiences although I feel it provides some authenticity to the screen.


Direction: 9

"Frozen River" is Courtney Hunt's first production as a feature film director and it is a fantastic initial entry. Everything in the film molds together and flows with incredible grace. Normally a film that is essentially a family drama set in a northern climate tends to waver on the boring side, but Hunt is able to latch and maintain viewer attention with her writing, camera work, and obvious skillful work with actors. A fantastic first film.


Editing: 8

The continuity and attention-grabbing charm of "Frozen River" is thanks to its wonderful editing. Editor Kate Williams understands the importance of pacing in a film and understands how long to hold a shot in a given moment and circumstance. By allowing the camera to rest on an actor for just a second longer than what feels comfortable allows the acting - if it's good - to shine through and this cast does in spades.


Acting: 8

Melissa Leo provides a better performance in this picture than Kate Winslet in "The Reader." In fact, "Frozen River" is a much better film as well. Leo invokes a genuineness in her character - Ray Eddy - in almost the same way Mickey Rourke showcased a defeated man in "Randy 'The Ram' Robinson" in "The Wrestler." Playing a struggling mother of two children who was recently abandoned and robbed by her husband, Leo conveys the shear desperation and maturity of a woman forced to conduct illegal business for the betterment of her family. Supporting actress Misty Upham also plays a wonderfully dynamic character in Lila Littlewold. She provokes anger, hatred, and sympathy from the audience. This is a gifted cast with great direction.

Writing: 9

There are few other films where you can find more honest and genuine dialogue. Every line feels appropriate and Hunt understands that sometimes silence is the best choice. However, there is no grand, inspirational monologue here, jut plain hearted writing straight from the heart to the screen.


Story: 7

The story is not anything that seems too out of the ordinary as it basically boils down to a typical family drama surrounding the desperate need for money during none other than Christmas. However, the Leo's serendipitous meeting with Upham takes the film on a tangent with an interesting twist. The interesting juxtaposition between Leo's hardships and illegal immigrants risking their lives and any security they have to come to America calls into question the very luxuries we enjoy every day. Many subtleties in both the story and overall production is the charm of "Frozen River."


Cinematography:
6

The cinematography is appropriate, but is hardly memorable. There are several "reflection" shots in mirrors which is just about the oldest trick in the book, but a nice touch since a majority of the viewing audiences will never pick up on what it signifies. Nevertheless, there isn't much you can do with a snowy up-state New York landscape.


Special Effects: 6

There aren't special effects and there is no cause for any in a film like this. However, there were a few scenes that were way too dark for me to make any sense of. I'm not sure if it was my TV or perhaps the lighting during production.


Music: 7

The music was rarely present. I think that perhaps there was little by way of a soundtrack or maybe since the story and production does such a good job of captivating the audience that the lack of music is hardly noticeable. I still wouldn't run out to buy the soundtrack or even care to hear any of it again.


Wow Factor: 7

Once again it was a delightful surprise to take a typical family drama in turn it into a mildly suspenseful adventure that maintains a viewer's interest. There are a few moments of legitimate danger and genuine suspense that warrants a slight spectacle. Of course the appropriate twist is made in the film's climax and resolves the story in somewhat of an expected manner.

Movie - 75

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Dragonball: Evolution

Overall Score: 51


Director: James Wong
Run Time: 85 min
Rating: PG


Viewer Bias: 6

Like several young men my age, I had a rather lengthy "Dragonball Z" phase. The non-stop action and excitement of the Japanese anime was incredibly appealing to me in my early teen years and resulted in an obsession the yielded the purchase of a plethora of memorabilia. Alas, hearing that a live-action iteration of the "Dragonball" series was going to be released in theaters brought back a wave of nostalgia that peaked my interest. However, being unable to convince others in their early 20s to fore go their cash (and pride) to go see the film led me to wait many months for the DVD release - and even a couple others to work up the courage at actually rent it.

After reading several reviews of the abomination, I had formulated very low expectations for "Dragonball: Evolution." These low expectations were not met. Despite being a formerly huge fan at least the "Dragonball Z" series, it is easy to see that "Dragonball: Evolution" is a terrible production and does not even attempt to bring justice to the anime series. It even raises several questions such as: Where did the original storyline go? Why is there a mixed number of Caucasian and Asian actors from a Japanese series? What did Chow Yung-Fat do to deserve this? Was that really Ernie Hudson? Sadly, "Winston" from "Ghostbusters" does make an appearance and thus "Dragonball: Evolution" is born.


Direction: 4

Although James Wong may have directed such notable, stellar films as Jet Li's "The One" (Pictures on a Screen) and "Final Destination 3" (straight to DVD), his direction falls very short of the mark. As you will no doubt see in later categories the acting is painful, the writing belongs in a "Star Wars" film, and the overall visual look of the film is laughable. Mr. Wong's direction did little to nothing to help this sinking ship and has officially dragged many formerly notable actor's careers in the mud.


Editing: 6

In a production with few things going for it, the editing isn't too terrible. There are a few awkward cuts, but considering the insanity of the characters and situation the editing is done decently well.


Acting: 5

All you need to know is that the acting is terrible...I mean really bad. Somehow Chow Yung-Fat, a man with numerous award winning accolades, and former Golden Globe nominee Emmy Rossum play second-banana to up-coming actor Justin Catwin who plays the 18-year-old Goku. The poor direction of James Wong and awful writing of Ben Ramsey severally limit the range and illuminate the idiocy of each character to project a facade of a film that only appeals to 12-year-olds even though none of them have any recollection of the source material. Chatwin's performance is garbage and any attempt he makes to convey emotion is laughable.


Writing: 3

I could have sworn that George Lucas wrote this screenplay. Dialogue has more cheese in it than a super market and dilute characters to a infantile state lower than the original cartoon - which is saying something. Somehow screenwriter Ben Ramsey, director James Wong, and actor Chow Yung-Fat all felt that Yung-Fat's Master Roshi character should first intimidate Goku with the line "Believe it punk! You are getting your clock cleaned." Enough said.


Story: 5

The only things that attach "Dragonball: Evolution" to the anime series are character names and the dragon balls themselves. The "PG" rated film takes more time contriving a "geeky high school boy likes high school girl" drama, complete with bullying and teenage insecurity, than it does forwarding a plot in any relation to the source material. At 85 minutes, that is not enough time to create anything of interest. Also, I'm not sure where some of these characters are coming from. For example, Piccolo's (who doesn't looking anything like Piccolo) minion Mia was slapped into this story and is about as one-dimensional as a dot - and has as many lines as well. Dare I say the words stupid, pointless, and a waste of time?


Cinematography:
6

The cinematography ranges from decent to terrible. This inconstancy is most notable between landscaped, panoramic shots and more intimate character reaction and process shots. The former are done pretty well and the latter...lets just say fits in with the rest of the film.


Special Effects: 5

Another strange inconsistency. The realism of CGI in "Drangonball: Evolution" is all across the board. The prologue sequence is done surprisingly well whereas Goku's "Kamehameha" blast belongs in a late night sci-fi mini series. It is difficult to pull off any believability in visual effects when the subject matter calls for a spiky haired man and green villain to fly through the air shooting energy blasts at one another - but they still could have done a better job. The climax of "Matrix Revolutions" is closer to "Dragonball Z" than this.


Music: 7

The music really wasn't all that bad. It is by far, the best part of the "Dragonball: Evolution" experience and co-insides very well with the action on-screen. Nevertheless, it was still not notable enough for you to recall after viewing the film.


Wow Factor: 4

"Dragonball: Evolution" could have made up for some desperately needed points here, but falls flat once again. I don't want to criticize the film for its "PG" rating like an irate teenage fanboy, but the diluted action of "Dragonball: Evolution" yeilded the lower rating. In a world were the average teenager flick is at least rated "PG-13," "Dragonball: Evolution" feels a little too watered down. Although it is refreshing to see an action title attempt to entertain without needless fetishization of women or extensive violence, a live-action take on the "Dragonball" universe does not warrant as delicate of a treatment. The original series would easily be rated "PG-13" or higher if the unrated versions were shown in theaters due to the high-octane, violent action which is the staple of the series. It seems as though Goku pulls too many of his punches and the whole film misses its mark, never to become a "Super Saiyan" in anyone's book.


Pictures on a Screen - 51